30/30 Image Archive Project (IAP) : A collective collection
The concept for 30/30 was developed by German artist, curator and artistic director of CCNOA Tilman. Implemented in 2010, IAP comprises in the meantime over 100 artworks by artists from around the globe. The collection was previously administered by CCNOA (http://ccnoa.org) and is now handled by d.a.c.
The first edition of 30/30 was presented in April 2010 at Minus Space, New York, the second edition opened on 7 November 2010 at PS, Amsterdam (NL), the third opened on 7 December 2012 at Moins Un, Paris (FR), the forth on 23 March 2014 at A I B I Contemporary, Zurich (CH), the fifth on 3 May 2014 at d.a.c Dolceacqua (IT), the sixth on 26 July 2014 at Look & Listen, Chamas (FR), and the seventh at SNO Sydney non-objective, Sydney (AU).
But beware, 30/30 is not your usual exhibition scenario but a continually growing collective collection of unique small-scale artworks by artists we have cooperated with over the last twelve years as well as newly invited artists from around the globe. So yes, definitely a divergence from the modus operandi of the past but a mission which nonetheless remains faithful to the same underlying objective: to showcase the excitingly wide range and high quality of contemporary artistic production in the realm of reductive art at international level.
Since its title contains terms that may equally well refer to a variety of other subjects, we decided to examine them a bit more closely in relation to our intentions and to share our findings with you. You are free to add on. Just send your comments to email@example.com. After all, this is a collective enterprise as well as a work in progress, based on cooperation not only between the artists and us but also between us and YOU, the end user.
First let’s look at the term 30/30.
30/30 simply refers to the exact size of the commissioned artworks, which is set at 30 x 30 cm with a maximum depth of 5 cm. Since the works don’t have to take the format of a square – they can be triangular or circular – we inserted a slash instead of a times sign between the numbers. Just when everybody else is continuing to go bigger (despite the recession) or at least hang on to the status quo, we have decided to go smaller.
Why did we choose this precise format?
Firstly, choosing this size will enable us to travel 30/30 cost-effectively – all the works fit neatly into one suitcase (at least for now – and it will allow us to store the collection easily. Of course it wasn’t us who came up with the idea of a “portable museum”. Marcel Duchamp did that in the 1930s with his Boîte-en-valise, a suitcase containing miniature reproductions of his work.
This, writes T.J. Demos, and his readymade constructions and installations for surrealist exhibitions in Paris and New York, all manifest, define, and exploit the terms of exile in multiple ways. Created while the artist was living variously in New York, Buenos Aires, and occupied France, during the global catastrophes of war and fascism, these works express the anguish of displacement and celebrate the freedom of geopolitical homelessness, with the “portable museum” representing a complex meditation – both critical and joyful – on modern art’s tendency toward itinerancy.
Even though none of us currently lives in exile and thus doesn’t necessarily experience the “anguish of displacement”, we very much identify with Demos’ interpretation of Duchamp’s “portable museum”. It not only reflects our philosophical standpoint and itinerant/nomadic demarche but also allows us to address how artistic concepts and practices travel, and are communicated and shared at supranational level. After all, moving is leaving and moving light makes leaving easier.
Secondly, this format poses an unusual challenge to both the artists and the public:
- Since most of the artists participating in 30/30 usually work in large – or larger –formats, the stipulated size as well as the fact that each artist is represented by one work only, definitely gets them thinking. Needless to say, they continue to come up with the most ingenious, daring and surprising solutions while staying faithful to the constituents of their respective practices. In time, we will conduct a survey and publish their thoughts on the subject, initially on our website and eventually in a printed publication, which will expand with the project and will be financed and published collectively by the artists and CCNOA.
- 30/30 challenges the common perception, prevalent not only in the art world that bigger is always better. It offers the public a unique opportunity to experience a broad spectrum of contemporary artworks on an intimate, concentrated scale creating the perfect context to explore and focus on microcosms in relation to each other as well as to the overall concept.
Thirdly, since 30/30 is designed to grow exponentially, it will provide an almost infinite number of possible work constellations allowing us to create exhibitions in any size of venue as well as to cooperate with and/or integrate into already existing private or public collections around the world on an extremely modest budget. These constellations will automatically generate multiple readings, interpretations and new points of departure as well as an in-depth dialogue on the issues relating to reductive art.
So, how about the term image?
There are many definitions of the term image (from the Latin imago). In the context of reductive art the definition of image as “a tangible or visible representation of an abstract concept or mental conception” perhaps comes closest to our use of the term.
And while on the term image we would like to add that 30/30 was also born of our discontent with the photographic images documenting our activities over the past twelve years. No matter how good they are, they will always remain secondary source material, failing to reflect the range or complexity of our activities or to give rise to any experience as such. Hence our decision to set the record straight and to establish an archival collection of primary source material in the form of real images.
This brings us to the next term in the title, the term archive. An archive is usually defined as a collection of public records or historical documents, as well as the place in which they are stored.
Even though archives can take many different forms, they generally contain primary source documents that have accumulated over the course of an individual’s or organization’s lifetime and have been selected for permanent or long-term preservation on grounds of their enduring cultural, historical or evidential value. Archival records are normally unpublished and almost always unique.
Even though, given its aim, accessibility, usage, ownership and portability, 30/30 diverges from the usual definition of archive, it could in some ways be compared to an archival collection of the type often found within libraries – like, for example, the New York Public Library with its exquisite collection of prints and artists’ books – or even historical societies or religious entities.
On to the remaining term project. A project is usually defined as a specific, collaborative enterprise involving research or design that is carefully planned to achieve a particular aim. To stay within the realm of art projects, we have the exquisite corpse, a method by which a collection of words or images is collectively assembled. Each collaborator adds to a composition in sequence, either by being allowed to see the end of what the previous person contributed or by following a rule – in our case the rules applied are a specific size and genre.
Now, if you look at the origins of the word project, things get a bit tricky. It comes from the Latin noun projectum and the Latin verb proicere, “to throw something forwards”, comprising the prefix pro-, which denotes something that precedes in time the action of the next part of the word and iacere, “to throw”. The word “project” thus originally meant “something that comes before anything else happens”. Initially in English it meant a plan of something, not the act of actually carrying this plan out. Something performed in accordance with a project became known as an “object”.
So, since we have already produced seven editions of 30/30, it has actually evolved from a project into an object. Are we stuck? Not really! 30/30 is constantly evolving and is therefore more or less a work in progress – a project – voila!
Well, that’s enough of splitting hairs, right? We are sure you get the picture! So now go ahead, see for yourselves, educate your eyes and develop your senses: After all, seeing is a creative act. He who only looks doesn’t see. Seeing means reflecting, perceiving, and being aware. He who only looks doesn’t know. Seeing involves binding in all the senses … creating sense. 
©Petra Bungert, November 2010
 The Exiles of Marcel Duchamp, The MIT Press, 2007.
 Gottfried Honegger, Aphorismen, Verlag Victor Hotz, 2006.